Republic of China
government in
exile
Newspaper: Detroit Free Press
page: page 8,
col. 1
date: April 29, 1955
subject: The Legal Status of
Formosa (Taiwan)
quote:
It has been charged that Chiang Kai-shek has no claim to the island
because he is "merely a fugitive quartering his army" there and besides, his is
a government in exile.
(source: The Western Political
Quarterly, Vol. 10, No. 2 (June 1957))
|
REFERENCE
as quoted in: "International Legal Status
of Formosa"
by Claude S. Phillips, Jr., University of Michigan
The
Western Political Quarterly, Vol. 10, No. 2 (June 1957), pp.
276-289
Enmeshed in a civil war between the Nationalists and the Communists
for control of China, Chiang's government mostly ignored Taiwan until 1949, when
the Communists won control of the mainland. That year, Chiang's Nationalists
fled to Taiwan and established a government-in-exile.
|
REFERENCE
as quoted in: Introduction to Sovereignty: A Case Study of Taiwan
Stanford Program on International and Cross-Cultural Education
published
2004 (160 pages)
After the war China established a garrison on Itu Aba, which the
Chinese Nationalists maintained after their exile to Taiwan.
|
REFERENCE
as quoted in: Geography & Travel Spratly Islands
Encyclopedia Britannica
Chiang Kai-shek
born October 31, 1887, Chekiang province,
China
died April 5, 1975, Taipei, Taiwan
soldier and statesman, head of
the Nationalist government in China from 1928 to 1949, and subsequently head of
the Chinese Nationalist government in exile on Taiwan.
|
REFERENCE
as quoted in: Chiang Kai-shek
Encyclopedia Britannica
p. 33 --
A Chinese title, under international
law, cannot be deduced from the presence of the Chiang Kai-shek exile government
on Taiwan.
p. 132 --
I am sure that the sponsors
of the draft resolution...seeking to preserve a seat for the Formosa regime ...
are aware of the controversy that is raging as to the representative character
of the Government based on that island. My Government has been inundated with
documents and petitions from people who claim to be Formosans, arguing that the
so-called Republic of China in exile cannot claim to represent the people of
Taiwan.
p. 133 --
The exiled nationalist Chinese
regime does not represent the people of Formosa....
p. 166
--
According to Professor Gene Hsiao, since the San Francisco Peace
Treaty and the separate KMT treaty with Japan did not specify to whom Japan was
ceding Taiwan and the Pescadores, the implication of the U.S . position was that
-- Legally, and insofar as the signatories of those two treaties were concerned,
Taiwan became an "ownerless" island and the KMT, by its own assent to the
American policy, a foreign government-in-exile.
|
REFERENCE
as quoted in: Let Taiwan
Be Taiwan
Documents on the International Status of Taiwan
Edited
with Analysis and Commentary by Marc J. Cohen and Emma Teng
year: 1990
Center for Taiwan International Relations, Washington, DC
|