March For Taiwan
MARCH FOR TAIWAN
info
*Why should the ROC be removed from Taiwan?
  http://www.taiwanbasic.com/nstatus/roc-exile.htm 




Republic of China
government in exile





Newspaper: Detroit Free Press
page: page 8, col. 1
date: April 29, 1955
subject: The Legal Status of Formosa (Taiwan)
quote:
It has been charged that Chiang Kai-shek has no claim to the island because he is "merely a fugitive quartering his army" there and besides, his is a government in exile.

(source: The Western Political Quarterly, Vol. 10, No. 2 (June 1957))



REFERENCE
as quoted in: "International Legal Status of Formosa"
by Claude S. Phillips, Jr., University of Michigan
The Western Political Quarterly, Vol. 10, No. 2 (June 1957), pp. 276-289





Enmeshed in a civil war between the Nationalists and the Communists for control of China, Chiang's government mostly ignored Taiwan until 1949, when the Communists won control of the mainland. That year, Chiang's Nationalists fled to Taiwan and established a government-in-exile.



REFERENCE
as quoted in: Introduction to Sovereignty: A Case Study of Taiwan
Stanford Program on International and Cross-Cultural Education
published 2004 (160 pages)








After the war China established a garrison on Itu Aba, which the Chinese Nationalists maintained after their exile to Taiwan.



REFERENCE
as quoted in: Geography & Travel Spratly Islands
Encyclopedia Britannica








Chiang Kai-shek
born October 31, 1887, Chekiang province, China
died April 5, 1975, Taipei, Taiwan
soldier and statesman, head of the Nationalist government in China from 1928 to 1949, and subsequently head of the Chinese Nationalist government in exile on Taiwan.



REFERENCE
as quoted in: Chiang Kai-shek
Encyclopedia Britannica








p. 33 --
A Chinese title, under international law, cannot be deduced from the presence of the Chiang Kai-shek exile government on Taiwan.


p. 132 --
I am sure that the sponsors of the draft resolution...seeking to preserve a seat for the Formosa regime ... are aware of the controversy that is raging as to the representative character of the Government based on that island. My Government has been inundated with documents and petitions from people who claim to be Formosans, arguing that the so-called Republic of China in exile cannot claim to represent the people of Taiwan.


p. 133 --
The exiled nationalist Chinese regime does not represent the people of Formosa....


p. 166 --
According to Professor Gene Hsiao, since the San Francisco Peace Treaty and the separate KMT treaty with Japan did not specify to whom Japan was ceding Taiwan and the Pescadores, the implication of the U.S . position was that -- Legally, and insofar as the signatories of those two treaties were concerned, Taiwan became an "ownerless" island and the KMT, by its own assent to the American policy, a foreign government-in-exile.



REFERENCE
as quoted in: Let Taiwan Be Taiwan
Documents on the International Status of Taiwan
Edited with Analysis and Commentary by Marc J. Cohen and Emma Teng
year: 1990
Center for Taiwan International Relations, Washington, DC